But some app makers and lawyers are worried that the FDA’s approach could be overkill. The FDA has also said it will publish final guidelines later this year, potentially sweeping tons of new apps under its jurisdiction. Late last month, the FDA sent a letter to one company that produces a urine analysis mobile app, ordering it to seek clearance to operate as an official medical device. Instead, another government agency, the US Food and Drug Administration, is picking up the gauntlet. The FTC is the agency in charge of protecting consumer interests when it comes to all types of products across industries, so it can’t focus narrowly on mobile medical apps going forward. 'If the FDA regulates in a broad brush fashion, that will stifle innovation.' Both apps were later pulled from app stores. Two years after AcneApp was introduced, the US Federal Trade Commission fined AcneApp and a similar rival product, AcnePwner, a collective $15,000, stating that they both made unsubstantiated scientific claims. 'Acne App Treats Your Zits With Your iPhone,' The Huffington Postreported definitively.Īs it it turns out, the dream of fighting acne with a pocket computer was indeed too good to be true. 'iPhone App Claims to Treat Acne With Light,' said ABC News. 'Anti-Acne App Available for the iPhone' trumpeted The New York Timesheadline. The app was greeted with a flurry of mostly positive press coverage.

AcneApp claimed to treat zits by shining alternating red and blue light out of a user’s iPhone screen, and boasted that it was created by a board-certified dermatologist. In 2009, when Apple’s App Store was just over a year old, an app popped up that seemed too good to be true.

Epocrates android crack